Of course I have no business saying so, but I think Pope St Francis is a bore. From the moment he said he wouldn’t wear the ruby red slippers, I thought the guy was a fraud. Then came the news that he’d ordered a Vespa (joke), wouldn’t live in the papal apartments, preferred washing the feet of tattooed prostitutes and criminals to those of his fellow priests on Maundy Thursday, and liked being called Bishop Francis (Why not just Jorge?) instead of Your Holiness.
What about “Your Silliness”? I have nothing against simplifying the world’s largest bureaucracy, being attentive to the needs of the gazillion Catholics in the southern reaches of the globe who now make up the largest active segment of the Church’s population, or eschewing the more flagrant symbols of office that Benedict XVI seemed to enjoy. –Confidentially, though, I like my popes to look like popes and not like an ad for Clorox. A little red as an accent colour reminds me the popes have blood, and sins, and aren’t simply parading around like perpetual virgins.
The problem with Francis is that he already looks like a guitar mass and a paper hymnal. There is something Old Vatican II about him that makes me want to bang my head against the wall. He has begun to sound like those Jesuits before him that gave us thirty years of tuneless tripe that tightlipped Catholic congregations refused to sing. In a scary, bad-memory kind of way he looks like those liberal priests who liked their liturgies (in the strict sense) vulgar, their chalices wooden, their genuflections optional and their altars square. For the sake of relevance OV-II style, it helped to make the congregation stand when they should kneel and put the tabernacle to one side in an ecclesiastical game of Where’s Waldo? That is the “context” Francis fits into away down south in Argie.
The idea he is anything new just shows you how quickly you can forget about how old and stale Vatican II had become by the time Benedict XVI replaced the drooling and Parkinson’s ravaged John Paul II, himself soon to be sainted for presiding over the total dissolution of Catholic liturgy and priestly training while the rest of the world looked on oblivious (and oddly forgiving) of his sins and limitations.
What is saddest about Francis is that he may honestly believe one gesture is worth a thousand bells. He may believe that the Catholic church is a church of the poor, or he may, more cannily, know that the future of the Church depends on a demographic that is largely poor and looks at a pope in red velvet and ermine-trimmed mozetta and sweet lacey surplice beneath as out of touch with the nitty gritty of the Church Militant—the old name for those of us here below, working out our salvation in an era of sexting and American Idol.
If Francis believes that his gestures are significant he is merely ignorant. If he fails to recognize that Benedict brought the Church back from a forty year decline into liturgical torpor that fell past the pedestrian into the ditch of banality, then he is both ignorant and malignant. At age 74, he may be too old or too diffident or (dare I say it) too new world to realize that people like a little paprika with their potatoes, and so far he is all stodge and no excitement. I think it was Steinbeck who said that no American thinks he is poor; he thinks he is a temporarily embarrassed millionaire. Most Catholics, for the same reason, like a pope who isn’t afraid to strut a bit, as long as underneath the strutting they sense compassion and integrity. To be honest, Francis is doing his own kind of strutting for the cameras, and I am not at all sure the integrity is there.
After a while, even the media are going to get sick of watching him be one of the guys. When we see him auctioning off treasures of the Vatican Museum or trying to hock the keys of the kingdom for a sensible padlock, we’ll know his moment in the limelight is over. But that, probably, will never happen. Francis will be too hard pressed to find new, meaningful gestures that seem to tweak his papacy as a papacy for the little guy without really doing much of anything. My own feeling, as a devout lapsed Catholic, is that if you’re not going to do much of anything, do it in style.
I am not sure what walk this pope is walking or talk he is talking because gestures, of course, are just that. They cost him nothing and change nothing that may need to be changed. The great virtue of his predecessor was that Benedict “knew” the Church in both real and historical terms. Francis has all the marks of a diocesan ordinary who thinks what worked in Buenos Aires will work globally. Benedict was all about recreating an authentic Catholicism that transcended the local, because Catholicism is, after all, by name and self-understanding, a global faith.
In pinpointing the life and ministry (and obsessions) of a thirteenth century monk as the way forward for the church universal, Francis runs the risk of becoming an artifact of Vatican II, a bit of nostalgia , repackaged as The Latest Thing. Shaw infamously teased about the teaching of St Paul that the conversion of barbarians to Christianity was the conversion of Christianity to barbarity. Francis’s determination to create a Church of the poor will impoverish the Church is ways still to be seen.
Impeccable points. What benefit are his pretentious gestures to the poor? Will he do anything to alleviate poverty in the world? He’s hoping his dramatic and ‘radical’ tradition breaking displays are distracting the world enough to make them forget the Church scandals, sex, marriage, contraception and ordination of women… So far he seems to have been successful in that. I’m dreading him scrapping Latin in Rome and calling for a more universal language to spread the ‘good news’ … like English or Chinese. I’m guessing less than a decade before we can be free from Silliness.
Ah yes, if you watched the Showtime series on The Borgias we know what a “real” Pope should be like and look like and act like–Jeremy Irons as Rodrigo Borgia!! Oh for the days of old!
This piece is excellent. It describes exactly how I feel.
I love the sentiment you express.
Perhaps it’s time to let the whole religion as temporal power thing wither while the rest of humanity gets on with the serious business of finding out how to run ourselves in equilibrium with the planet we call home.
Your comments on Pope Francis in this and previous articles do not go down very well with me! They may get applause from your fellow cynics in the U.S. of A. but for someone who has lived and worked with the poor in Argentina they come over as snide and ignorant. “Untuned guitars” indeed! The poor guitar players in the Argentine Chaco could teach your north american “guitarists” how to play properly.
If your comments are an example of how athiests treat others, then I am glad that I am still a Christian!!
I think that everything said made a ton of sense. But,
consider this, what if you composed a catchier title? I am not suggesting your information
is not good., however what if you added a
title that makes people want more? I mean Pope and Circumstance | The New
Oxonian is a little vanilla. You ought to look at Yahoo’s home page and note how they create news titles to get
viewers to open the links. You might add a video or a pic or two to grab people interested
about what you’ve written. In my opinion, it would make your blog a little bit more interesting.